?

Log in

About this Journal
Republican Re-Election Campaign 2004: All September 11th, All The Tyme...

"If George W. Bush hadn't been Pres'dent on September 11th, we'd all be speakin' Arabic right about nah." ~ Carter Dales, Opelika, Alabama ~ November 20, 2002.

President George W. Bush: A pre-modern man in post-modern tymes.

Florida, Ohio, and Pennsylvania may want to ask themselves: "Do I want to stand with Michigan, Illinois, New York, and California, or do I want to stand with Kentucky, Texas, Alabama, and South Carolina???"


Days Left Till November 2nd
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30
Apr. 14th, 2006 @ 11:19 am Prog Rock Is Great
The truth about 9/11.
Please educate yourself.
This is one of the most comprehensive films you can watch.


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=Loose+Change&pl=true
This Is You
tinycapillaries:
Oct. 28th, 2004 @ 02:08 am Prog Rock Is Great
ALERT:Russian special forces troops moved many of Saddam Hussein's weapons and related goods out of Iraq and into Syria in the weeks before the March 2003 U.S. military operation, The Washington Times has learned.John A. Shaw, the deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, said in an interview that he believes the Russian troops, working with Iraqi intelligence, “almost certainly” removed the high-explosive material that went missing from the Al-Qaqaa facility, south of Baghdad. More from Washington Post
This Is You
agent008x:
Sep. 7th, 2004 @ 10:17 am By the end of the day...
Acording to this site, http://icasualties.org/oif/ , as of 10:18 a.m. Regina tyme, September 7, 999 US troops have been killed in iRaq, meaning just one more and 1,000!! Whoo-wee. That was fast.
This Is You
feztickle:
Sep. 6th, 2004 @ 09:46 am Approaching One Thousand
Who'd heard that August/04 was the deadliest for American troops in iRaq since the beginning of the war? As far as I knew, and I pay attention, it was the most quiet. Not so.

Sixty-six died while over 1,000 were injured during the month of August alone.

The Republican bitch machine must be doing wonders: after the April uprising in Fallujah, conscientious rightwingers attacked the media for "dwelling" on the dead and not on the living, accusing the media of anti-Bush bias. The Repukes worked the refs brilliantly, apparently, because the media stopped reporting deaths, hence my amazement when I learned of August's deadliness.

Today, an attack too large to ignore: seven marines dead by a car bomb outside of Fallujah, tho I heard nothing of the two that died in Bahgdad yesterday, for a total of 985.

Perhaps once that total reaches 1,000 which it will by the end of next week, it will start having an effect of the election: 1,000 dead, 0 WMDs. That's if the rightwing media begins to report the dead again, and stops fabricating this sterile, stalemate type of reality in iRaq which is completely false.
This Is You
feztickle:
Sep. 5th, 2004 @ 04:02 pm Kiss The Whip
Chillin' Out?: Bright Eyes
As asked last Thursday by Jon Stewart on the JS Show, why the hell are the Republicans so damn angry?

Since January 2001, the Republican Party has controlled the White House, the House, the Supreme Court, and with the exception of 16 unproductive Democratic months between June '01 and November '02, the Senate.

What's more, they've had pure whip-kissing, Democratic support on nearly everything since September 11th.

So why, at their convention last week, and why in general, are the Republicans so god-damned pissed-off at everything all the tyme? Why?

It's called "working the crowd", much like their constant griping about the non-existent opposition "liberal media" works "the refs.

The Republicans figure the more they bitch about non-existent unfair treatment by the "liberal media", the more the media will come to believe they actually are biased in favour of liberal causes, and the more they will censor themselves against keeping conservatives accountable, for fear they suffer another paper-tiger Republican tongue-lashing, and/or lose access to Repub moneymakers.

"Paper tiger" because said Republican outrage never amounts to anything more than seeing how much they can get away with. There's never any substance to Republican claims of a leftwing bias in the media; but, they know the national media is weak and restricted by its sponsors from actually doing its job, so Repubs take advantage of this carte-blanche by nudging the boundaries a little further right at every opportunity.

They take the same approach with the public. They act SO dissatisfied all the time that their "perfectly reasonable" agenda continues to be thwarted by the "liberal" opposition, that they begin to elicit sympathy from moderates with brain damage who cannot believe anyone, especially liberals, would deny the party of September 11th heroics what they needed to secure the nation and return it to its pre-9/11 glory.

Power, they just want power, and somehow the Democrats have remained too subordinated by this strategy that not one has ever stood up and denounced the Repukes for such tactics, going back to the beginning of the Lewinsky thing in the latter-90s.

Look at John Kerry: He's facing a bunch of yellow-bellied, lily-livered chickenhawks who have no problem sending the world to war but who had no intention of serving themselves when they had the chance. Yet, the whole Democratic party just sits there and watches Kerry credibility plummet in the heartland.

Haven't they learned that all you gotta do to shatter a bigmouth chickenhawk is to stand up to him and call him on his bullshit?

"They berate me for having served only four and a half months combat duty in Vietnam," Kerry should say. "Well, that's four and a half months longer than President George W. Bush or Veep Dick Cheney ever spent in a combat zone 'protecting America' during the Vietnam war..."

(Kerry spent well over one year total in Vietnam...)

"George Bush and Dick Cheney say I'd be 'soft on terror'? George W. Bush and Dick Cheney did nothing on terrorism during the first 8 months of their presidency, and have squandered a golden opportunity since to eradicate al Qaeda from the planet by wasting two years, billions of dollars, and 1000 soldiers' lives in Iraq chasing after weapons that don't exist to remove a dictator that was about as powerful as a tuna fish.

George W. Bush has built his entire presidency upon the charred remains of the 2,800 dead Americans he failed to protect on September 11th, 2001."

That's what the aristocratic bastard should say if he wants to win in November. But then, maybe he doesn't...

(Under Clinton, terrorism was given the third highest priority on the national agenda; under Bush, it was dropped to 12th most important facing the nation.)
This Is You
feztickle:
Sep. 5th, 2004 @ 09:43 am Give 'Em What They Want
U.S. Media begins paving the way for the Bush administration's "October Surprise"...

Is there any doubt bin Laden and/or his corpse will be strung up and paraded around like a marionette for US media sometyme between NOW and Election Day, November 2?

That's what those in the know are calling Bush's "October Surprise".

September 5: U.S. Near Seizing Bin Laden, Official Says

By MATTHEW PENNINGTON, Associated Press Writer

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - The United States and its allies have moved closer to capturing Osama bin Laden (news - web sites) in the last two months, a top U.S. counterterrorism official said in a television interview broadcast....

"What I tell people, I would be surprised but not necessarily shocked if we wake up tomorrow and he's been caught along with all his lieutenants. That can happen because of the programs and infrastructure in place," he told Geo.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040905/ap_on_re_as/pakistan_bin_laden_11
This Is You
feztickle: